Stop Killing Games Wins Historic California Vote: What AB 1921 Means for Filipino Gamers
In a landmark victory for gamers worldwide, California's State Assembly passed the Protect Our Games Act (AB 1921) on May 28, 2026, with 43 voting for it and 16 against . This historic legislation could fundamentally change how game publishers operate—not just in California, but globally. For Filipino gamers who've invested in titles like Mobile Legends, Free Fire, and other online games, this bill represents unprecedented protection against losing access to games you've paid for.
The Stop Killing Games movement, which began in 2024 after Ubisoft's controversial shutdown of racing game The Crew, has achieved what many thought impossible: bringing consumer protection legislation to one of the world's largest gaming markets. This isn't just about preserving old games—it's about protecting your rights as a consumer in an increasingly digital gaming landscape.
What Is California's AB 1921 Protect Our Games Act?
Assembly Bill 1921, known as the Protect Our Games Act , is California's response to growing concerns about digital game ownership. The bill requires digital game publishers to maintain an environment where games remain accessible even after service is discontinued .
Assembly member Chris Ward introduced the Protect Our Games Act to the California Assembly in February 2026, and the bill has since navigated through the Privacy and Consumer Protection Committee, Judiciary Committee, and Appropriations Committee before reaching the full Assembly floor . The successful floor vote represents months of legislative work and grassroots organizing.
The Vote Breakdown
The bill passed with a vote of 43 to 16, largely along party lines with 41 democrats in favor (1 opposed), and 15 republicans opposed (2 in favor). A total of 21 assembly members were also absent from the vote . This bipartisan support, though skewed Democratic, demonstrates that game preservation resonates across political lines.
For Filipino gamers who frequently invest in free MLBB diamonds Philippines or purchase premium games, this legislation sets a crucial precedent for consumer protection in the digital age. When you buy a game, shouldn't you actually own it?
Why California Matters to Global Gaming
The fact that the bill passed the Assembly in California—home to many major U.S. game companies like EA and Activision Blizzard—is highly symbolic. If the bill is ultimately signed into law, it is expected to influence the service operation policies of the broader U.S. gaming industry .
While the bill would technically be law only in California, the state's global economic footprint would effectively force companies to roll it out worldwide. Developers would have to create an offline build for California residents, meaning the infrastructure and groundwork would already be in place for every owner .
How the Bill Works: Requirements for Publishers
AB 1921 establishes clear obligations for game publishers. Understanding these requirements helps Filipino gamers know what protections they'll have for future game purchases.
60-Day Notice Requirement
The bill would require game companies to provide 60 days' notice prior to ending support for games reliant on online servers . This notification must include specific information:
- The date on which services necessary for the ordinary use of the digital game will cease, any services that will no longer be provided by the operator, any game features that will no longer be available to the purchaser, and any known security risks that may result from the cessation of services
Post-Shutdown Options
Under the bill, companies selling digital games released or resold after January 1, 2027, must provide at least 60 days' notice before terminating service. Furthermore, they must ensure that purchasers can continue to access the game—such as by providing an alternative version or a patch—and must offer refunds if doing so is not possible .
Sales Restrictions
The bill also prohibits the continued sale or distribution of games that have become unusable due to service termination . This prevents the predatory practice of selling games that publishers know will soon become unplayable.
What "Ordinary Use" Means
In the Act, ordinary use is defined as "a purchaser's ability to use the core features of a digital game, consistent with the reasonable expectations of a purchaser based on how the digital game was advertised, marketed, or otherwise described by the digital game operator at the time of purchase" .
This definition is crucial for games like Mobile Legends or Call of Duty Mobile, where multiplayer is the core feature. Publishers would need to provide ways to maintain that core functionality, whether through offline modes, bot matches, or community servers. Gamers looking to earn free GCash online through gaming could have more confidence investing time in games knowing their progress won't disappear overnight.
The Stop Killing Games Movement: From YouTube to Parliament
The journey from grassroots campaign to legislative victory is remarkable. Understanding this movement's history helps appreciate the magnitude of this achievement.
Origins: The Crew Shutdown
The controversy began in 2024 when Ubisoft shut down its racing game, 'The Crew.' By terminating server operations, Ubisoft effectively blocked purchasers from accessing the game itself, prompting some users to raise the question: 'Did we buy the game or just rent temporary access?'
The Stop Killing Games movement was kicked up by YouTuber Scott Ross. Also known as Accursed Farms, Ross took issue with Ubisoft shutting down their open world driving sim The Crew in 2024. Ross' campaign argues that games should not be so easily removed from their players, breaking apart the increasingly common relationship that suggests players merely lease the software they've paid for instead of own .
European Parliament Success
Before California's victory, the movement achieved remarkable success in Europe. Two years after kicking off what looked to be a long-shot campaign to push back on the practice of shutting down server-dependent videogames once they're no longer profitable, Stop Killing Games founder Ross Scott and organizer Moritz Katzner appeared in front of the European Parliament to present their case .
On April 16, 2026, Scott, along with organizer Moritz Katzner, presented their case before the European Parliament. The hearing went extremely well for the Stop Killing Games movement . MEP Anna Cavazzini, chair of the Committees on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection thanked and congratulated the speakers "for the great work you have done" .
Global Momentum
On February 19, Scott revealed that two official Stop Killing Games non-governmental organisations (NGO) were launched in the EU and the US, stating that it will allow for "long-term counter lobbying" . This organizational infrastructure has proven crucial for sustaining the movement's legislative push.
A new formal response for the Stop Killing Games movement is expected by July 2026 from the European Commission, potentially setting even more precedents for game preservation worldwide.
Which Games Are Affected? Exemptions Explained
Not all games fall under AB 1921's requirements. Understanding the scope helps Filipino gamers know which purchases are protected.
Games Covered by AB 1921
The bill applies specifically to digital games first sold or substantially re-released in California after January 1, 2027 . This means:
- New releases from January 2027 onward
- Substantial re-releases or remasters of older games
- Games requiring online authentication to play
- Digitally-purchased games with server-dependent features
Exemptions: Free-to-Play and Subscription Games
The Act doesn't apply to Free-to-play games, subscription-based games, or to games that were released or re-released before January 1st 2027, as well as titles where a permanent offline downloadable version is available .
This exemption is significant for the Philippines gaming market, where free-to-play titles dominate. Games where players typically seek Free Fire redeem codes 2026 or free Robux Philippines won't have shutdown protection—but the premium games you buy will.
What About Games Already Shut Down?
Games that have already been shut down will not be affected by the bill passing, even if it does make it that far. And if the legal process ticks over into 2027, the law would only take effect from January 2028 onwards .
Unfortunately, this means games like The Crew, Concord, or other already-defunct titles won't be revived. The bill is forward-looking, designed to prevent future shutdowns rather than reverse past ones.
Impact on Filipino Gamers and the Philippines Gaming Scene
While AB 1921 is a California law, its effects will ripple across the Pacific to impact Filipino gamers significantly.
Why This Matters for Philippines Gaming
The Philippines has one of the fastest-growing gaming markets in Southeast Asia. Filipino gamers spend millions on digital games annually, from PC titles on Steam to mobile games on iOS and Android. Many of these purchases are made through platforms that operate under California-based companies or their subsidiaries.
When major publishers like Electronic Arts, Activision Blizzard, or Epic Games implement offline modes or refund policies for California, they typically roll out these changes globally rather than create region-specific versions. This means Filipino gamers could benefit from California's consumer protections even without local legislation.
Mobile Gaming Considerations
The Philippines' mobile-first gaming culture presents unique considerations. While free-to-play games dominate the market, premium mobile titles and in-app purchases for paid games would fall under AB 1921's protections if sold after January 2027.
For Filipinos exploring ways to earn money online Philippines through gaming content creation or competitive play, the stability provided by game preservation laws offers more confidence in building communities around specific titles.
E-Sports and Competitive Gaming
The Philippines' thriving e-sports scene could benefit from game preservation. Professional players, teams, and tournament organizers invest significant resources into specific titles. Knowing that purchased games have end-of-life protections reduces the risk of sudden shutdowns disrupting competitive ecosystems.
Regional Marketplace Impact
Filipino gamers frequently shop during major sales events, hunting for the best deals Philippines today on gaming platforms. With AB 1921's protections, these purchases carry less risk. Even if a game's online servers eventually shut down, you'll either get to keep playing or receive a refund—making those sale purchases safer investments.
What's Next: Senate Vote and Global Implications
The Assembly vote is just one step in California's legislative process. Understanding the path forward helps gauge when these protections might actually take effect.
California State Senate Process
It now moves to the California State Senate, where it will need public support to advance . The Senate needs a minimum of 21 votes to pass it, after which it heads to the Governor of California. The Governor then has 12 days to sign it into law, let it pass without a signature, or veto it .
Timeline for Implementation
If AB 1921 passes the Senate and receives the Governor's signature in 2026, the bill would apply to games released or resold after January 1st, 2027 . However, if the legal process ticks over into 2027, the law would only take effect from January 2028 onwards .
- May 28, 2026: Assembly passes AB 1921 (43-16 vote)
- June-July 2026: Senate committee review and floor vote
- Late 2026: Potential Governor signature
- January 1, 2027: Earliest enforcement date for new game releases
How Gamers Can Support the Bill
Ward has specifically appealed to gamers, not just industry lobbyists, to make their voices heard. California residents can find their State Senator at findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov and submit support for the bill .
While Filipino gamers can't directly vote in California, international support matters. Sharing information about AB 1921, engaging with gaming communities, and supporting similar initiatives creates a global movement that politicians notice.
Global Legislative Momentum
California's action doesn't exist in isolation. The European Union is considering similar measures following Stop Killing Games' founder Ross Scott and organised Moritz Katzner presenting their case to the European Parliament, in a hearing that appeared to be positively received by the committee .
A reply to that hearing is due back in the next few weeks , potentially establishing EU-wide game preservation requirements that would affect Filipino gamers purchasing from European publishers.
Industry Response: ESA Opposition and Developer Concerns
Not everyone in the gaming industry supports AB 1921. Understanding the opposition helps anticipate potential challenges and compromises.
Entertainment Software Association's Position
Earlier in May, the ESA objected to the bill, claiming it "could force developers to spend limited time and resources keeping old systems running instead of creating new games, features, and technology" .
The Entertainment Software Association (ESA) has recently voiced opposition to the push for expanded game preservation, arguing that opening server code or online features of discontinued games could lead to security and intellectual property issues .
Stop Killing Games' Response
Stop Killing Games responded at the time, stating that "This is the same fight as in Europe: a grass-roots consumer movement asking for basic end-of-life protections, versus the industry lobby trying to preserve the right to sell games that can later be rendered useless while preserving control" .
Developer Cost Concerns
Some developers worry about the costs of implementing end-of-life planning. However, when end-of-life planning is included in a game's development budget, the impact is "very small." He added that some estimates for end-of-life costs by game studios are "faulty," because they factor in features that are no longer needed in an offline game .
Legitimate Technical Challenges
Not all opposition stems from anti-consumer sentiment. Some games have genuinely complex architectures where server-side processing is integral to gameplay. Massively multiplayer online games, for instance, can't simply be "made offline" without fundamental redesigns.
AB 1921 acknowledges this by allowing refunds as an alternative to providing playable versions. Publishers facing insurmountable technical challenges can choose the refund option rather than being forced to maintain servers indefinitely.
| Stakeholder | Position | Main Argument |
|---|---|---|
| Stop Killing Games | Strong Support | Consumer protection and digital ownership rights |
| ESA (Industry Lobby) | Opposition | Resource diversion and technical complexity |
| Independent Developers | Mixed | Support consumer rights but worry about costs |
| Major Publishers | Quiet Opposition | Prefer current business models |
| Consumer Advocates | Strong Support | Digital ownership and preservation |
Frequently Asked Questions
Will AB 1921 force publishers to keep online servers running forever?
No. AB 1921 does not require publishers to maintain online servers indefinitely. Instead, it requires them to provide 60 days notice before shutdown and then either: (1) provide an offline-playable version of the game, (2) enable community-hosted servers, or (3) issue full refunds. Publishers can still shut down their servers—they just need to ensure the game remains playable or compensate customers.
Do free-to-play games like Mobile Legends and Free Fire have these protections?
No. AB 1921 specifically exempts free-to-play games and subscription-based services. The law only applies to games that require an upfront purchase or substantial payment. This means popular Filipino titles like Mobile Legends Bang Bang, Free Fire, and Genshin Impact (which are free-to-play) are not covered by these protections.
Will this law affect games I already own?
Unfortunately, no. AB 1921 only applies to games released or substantially re-released after January 1, 2027. Games you already own or games that were shut down before this date are not affected. The law is forward-looking and designed to prevent future shutdowns rather than address past ones.
As a Filipino gamer, how does a California law affect me?
While AB 1921 is technically only law in California, it will likely affect Filipino gamers significantly. Major game publishers based in California (like Electronic Arts, Activision Blizzard, and many others) typically implement policy changes globally rather than creating region-specific versions. When they add offline modes or refund systems for California, those features usually become available worldwide. Additionally, international pressure from movements like this can inspire similar legislation in other countries, including potentially the Philippines.
What happens if a publisher violates AB 1921?
AB 1921 would be enforced by the California Attorney General or district attorneys through civil action. Publishers who violate the law by shutting down games without proper notice or failing to provide refunds/playable versions could face legal penalties. The specific fines and enforcement mechanisms would be determined by the courts, but the law gives California's legal system clear authority to prosecute violations.
The Future of Digital Ownership in Gaming
The passage of AB 1921 through California's State Assembly represents more than just one legislative victory—it signals a fundamental shift in how society views digital ownership. For too long, gamers have accepted that purchasing a game might only grant temporary access, subject to corporate decisions about server maintenance and profitability.
Filipino gamers, who invest heavily in digital gaming through both purchases and countless hours of gameplay, deserve the same protections as physical product consumers. When you buy a physical game cartridge, no company can remotely disable it years later. Digital games should offer similar permanence, or at minimum, clear pathways to refunds when services end.
The Stop Killing Games movement has proven that grassroots organizing, even starting from a single YouTuber's frustration, can achieve real legislative change. From The Crew's shutdown in 2024 to testimony before the European Parliament to California's Assembly vote in 2026, this movement has grown into a serious force for consumer rights.
Whether you're hunting for daily deals Philippines on gaming platforms or building a career in e-sports, game preservation affects your investments of both money and time. The next few months will determine whether AB 1921 becomes law, potentially setting a global standard for digital game ownership.
Stay informed, support consumer protection initiatives, and remember: when you buy a game, you should actually own it.
Stay Updated on Gaming News
Follow Smartly.Sale for the latest gaming news, deals, and consumer rights updates affecting Filipino gamers. Whether you're tracking the Stop Killing Games movement, looking for the next big sale, or seeking ways to maximize your gaming budget, we've got you covered with expert analysis and practical advice.